All Aboard For The New Year

DREAM BOAT

Smooth sailing to you in the year ahead—on journeys both real and imagined. As you venture into new waters, may you find time to relax, reflect, and lose yourself in a good book. When the seas grow rough, find your footing, stand steady on deck, and hold fast to joy, hope, and love—the essential ingredients for dreams to come true. Thank you for being part of my journey. 

Wishing you a joyful and fulfilling New Year

MARILYNNE

Stay in touch:

Author website: springgreen-penguin-970219.hostingersite.com/

Artist website: www.eichingerfineart.com

email: marilynne@eichingerfineart.com

Reason Vs. Dogma

Curtain’s Up

Music and painting have a way of lifting our spirits and uniting us. They pull back the curtains separating people and soften the differences that weigh us down.

The Puritans came to the New World seeking religious freedom from the Church of England, which they believed had not gone far enough in breaking from Catholicism and still retained too many “Popish” rituals. They founded what became the Congregationalist tradition, grounded in the belief that churches should be autonomous, self-governing communities of worshipers. Christ, not bishops, was the ultimate authority.

Their faith rested on Calvinist doctrine, including predestination: the belief that God had already determined who would be saved and who would be damned, independent of human merit. This worldview demanded strict moral behavior and absolute obedience to scripture. While it offered certainty, it left little room for individual conscience or spiritual flexibility.

By the early 1800s, a reformed branch of Congregationalism emerged in response to a rapidly changing world shaped by industrial capitalism, scientific discovery, and social upheaval. This movement eventually broke away to form Unitarianism, which emphasized internal spiritual principles rather than miracles as the foundation of conscience. Unitarians believed each person could connect directly with the spiritual world and that every soul possessed inherent worth, without a division between the saved and the damned.

The Congregationalists established Harvard College to educate ministers and civic leaders with a Calvinist foundation. Over time, however, Harvard’s curriculum grew more liberal, shifting toward Unitarian thought and emphasizing reason, intellect, and moral philosophy. Many of these early Unitarians were drawn to a philosophical and literary movement gaining traction in Europe: Transcendentalism.

The term “transcendental” traces back to Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (1788), which explored how moral knowledge arises from human reason and inner experience. In America, the movement took shape in the 1830s, notably after a meeting at Harvard’s Bicentennial celebration in 1836 attended by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau.

Transcendentalists believed in individualism, self-reliance, and direct spiritual experience. They saw nature as a primary source of truth and rejected rigid doctrines that reinforced social hierarchy and materialism. What stayed with me from transcendentalist writing was the idea that freedom of thought was necessary if people were to live honestly.

Crucially, transcendentalists extended this belief beyond the privileged. They recognized the enslaved, the imprisoned, and the mentally and physically challenged as full members of society, entitled to equal spiritual and moral consideration. Personal liberty, in their view, was inseparable from social justice.

These ideas spread throughout the young nation, shaping both its literature and its politics. Emerson’s essays challenged conformity and urged moral independence. Thoreau’s Walden and later Civil Disobedience championed simplicity, nonconformity, and ethical resistance. The movement also drew figures such as Nathaniel Hawthorne, Louisa May Alcott, Elizabeth Peabody—who pioneered the kindergarten movement in the United States—and Margaret Fuller, a leading advocate for women’s rights.

Several U.S. presidents were directly connected to Unitarian or transcendentalist thought. John Adams moved from Congregationalism toward Unitarianism, rejecting the divinity of Christ as incompatible with reason. His son, John Quincy Adams, helped found the First Unitarian Church of Washington, D.C. Millard Fillmore was a longtime member of a Unitarian congregation in Buffalo, and William Howard Taft openly identified as Unitarian and supported the American Unitarian Association.

Other presidents, while not formally affiliated, reflected transcendentalist ideals in their thinking. Thomas Jefferson championed intellectual freedom and the pursuit of knowledge. James Madison emphasized personal conscience and moral responsibility. Abraham Lincoln’s focus on self-reliance and ethical duty echoes transcendentalist influence, as does Rutherford B. Hayes’s commitment to education and social reform.

I was not raised in a Unitarian household, but growing up on the East Coast meant absorbing many of these ideas almost by osmosis. I still hold them close. I remember classrooms where questioning was encouraged. and dinner-table discussions where disagreements livened the conversation.  I looked to science and nature for understanding, and I believed in the inherent worth of every human being. Most of all, I’ve learned that deeply held differences don’t have to lead to hatred or fear, and that they don’t have to end the dialogue.

As I move into a new year, transcendental principles feel less like history and more like the world I remember. Empathy, curiosity, and moral courage have long been part of the American experiment. I’ll try to carry them forward in small, ordinary ways; by listening, by questioning, and by resisting the urge to reduce people to labels.

My hope for 2026 is a simple one: more room for thoughtful disagreement, more generosity of spirit, and a renewed faith in our shared humanity. I wish you a peaceful holiday season spent with those you love, and an openness to cherishing the good in one another.

Peer into a transcendentalist heart through Marilynne’s art and books.

Artist website at www.eichingerfineart.com

Author’s website at springgreen-penguin-970219.hostingersite.com/

Comment on my blog site at

References:

1) Gura, P. (2012). Transcendentalism and Social Reform. The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. Retrieved from https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/transcendentalism-and-social-reform

2) Cole, P. 19198 Mary Moody Emerson and the Origins of Transcendentlism. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/mary-moody-emerson-and-the-origins-of-transcendentalism?

3)William R. Hutchison, The Transcendental Ministers: Church Reform in the New England Renaissance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959), is still the best source for the religious roots of the controversy between younger and older Unitarians.

4)  Emerson makes the distinction between the Reason and Understanding in his “Divinity School Address” of 1838. He speaks of the Oversoul in 1841 in the essay by that name.

5)  Richard Francis, Fruitlands: The Alcott Family and Their Search for Utopia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010).

6) Elizabeth Peabody, “Egotheism, the Atheism of Today” (1858), reprinted in idem., Last Evening with Allston and Other Papers (Boston: D. Lathrop, 1886), 3.

7) Ralph Waldo Emerson to Moncure Daniel Conway, June 6, 1860, in Ralph L. Rusk and Eleanor M. Tilton, Letters of Ralph Waldo Emerson, 10 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1939–1995), 5: 221; and Emerson, Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks, ed. William H. Gilman, et al., 16 vols. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960–1982), 14: 352–353.

8) Octavius Brooks Frothingham, Transcendentalism in New England: A History (New York: Putnam, 1876), 331.

A Gene For Cruelty

Can a youth overcome life in a dysfunctional, drug-abusing household to become a contributing member of society? Making the switch isn’t easy. Streetwise once told me that he preferred to go to jail, where he’d have a warm bed and food, rather than spend the rest of his life on the streets.

Do people have a genetic predisposition toward being evil? When I look at conflicts around the world and growing divisions in our own country, I can’t help but revisit the old nurture vs. nature question. With human rights abuses mounting, I wonder whether science has learned more since the completion of the Human Genome Project.

Psychologists identify sadistic or callous individuals as those who score high on measures of lying, manipulativeness, lack of empathy, aggression, and criminality. Large twin studies suggest that traits associated with psychopathy are moderately to highly heritable. This means genetics plays a significant role. Individuals with stronger genetic predispositions showed higher levels of callousness and emotional detachment.

Psychopaths and sociopaths both disregard social norms, customs, and the rights of others without remorse. Sociopaths tend to be more impulsive and emotionally volatile. Their crimes are often spontaneous actions that may later cause them distress. Psychopaths are outwardly controlled and more elusive to recognition. They often lead outwardly normal lives, manipulating others by mimicking emotions they do not truly feel.

There is evidence that psychopathy has a stronger biological component, while sociopathy is more closely linked to trauma and neglect. Still, most researchers agree that behavior emerges from gene–environment interaction, not from genetics alone.

This question became personal for me when I learned of ongoing bullying in my granddaughter’s fourth-grade class. I wondered whether those children had been subjected to violence or neglect at home. That instinct aligns with research showing that early adversity is one of the strongest predictors of later aggression. I felt the school needed to address it immediately so the children wouldn’t carry unresolved trauma into adulthood, potentially harming others.

What my intuition didn’t fully consider was how biology can influence those experiences. One gene I read about is MAOA, sometimes called the “warrior gene.” Certain variants of MAOA affect how the brain regulates neurotransmitters linked to mood and impulse control. Research suggests these variants are associated with increased risk of aggressive or antisocial behavior, especially when combined with childhood trauma. Children without that genetic vulnerability appear more likely to overcome early abuse. Those with both the gene variant and early trauma were more likely to be convicted of violent crimes later in life.

When neuroscientist Christian Jarrett was asked whether there is evidence-based therapy for individuals with psychopathic traits, his answer was cautious. Recently, New Zealand psychologists have called the belief that psychopathy cannot be treated a myth. New evidence suggests that intensive cognitive behavioral programs can reduce violent behavior and help some individuals experience empathy and regret, even though their core personality traits remain unchanged.

Another emerging field, epigenetics, further complicates the story. Severe stress or trauma can leave chemical markers on genes involved in stress regulation, altering how those genes are expressed. Research involving Holocaust survivors and other victims of political violence suggests these effects may persist across generations, allowing violence and neglect to continue beyond a single lifetime.

Unfortunately, cruelty can also feel rewarding in the short term. For some, fighting and hurting others is exciting, giving a sense of power. Since the neurochemicals responsible for those feelings don’t last, it often leads to repeated acts of cruelty in search of stimulating this pleasure response. The cycle most often has a negative impact on the perpetrator’s health.

By contrast, good deeds such as helping, cooperating, and caring activate brain systems linked to long-term well-being. Kindness and generosity are associated with lower stress, better health, and sustained happiness. Goodness reinforces itself, also propelling a cycle that makes people want to do more.

When we look at today’s political landscape, the violent treatment of immigrants, waiting for deportation, the killing of drug suspects willing to surrender, and the disproportionate incarceration of people based on skin color, I feel fear. I am tempted to wonder whether sociopaths or psychopaths are at the helm, knowing that what they are doing is a crime against humanity.

Though genes matter and trauma matters, having a trustworthy leader matters more. If we want a future with less fear and violence, we must focus on electing leaders who reduce harm, protect children and citizens, and build environments that reward empathy rather than cruelty.

References:

Stokstad,E. (2002) Violent Effects of Abuse Tied to Gene. Science. Retrieved from https://www.science.org/content/article/violent-effects-abuse-tied-gene

Jarrett,C. (2025). Can people have a genetic predisposition towards being evil? BBC Science Focus. Retrieved from https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/can-people-have-a-genetic-predisposition-towards-being-evil

Jarrett,C. (2025) Is there a cure for evil? BBScience Focus. Retrieved from https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/is-there-a-cure-for-evil

(2025) Violence alters human genes for generations, researchers discover. Science Daily.

Viding, E., & McCrory, E. (2019). Towards understanding atypical social affiliation in psychopathy. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(5), 437–444.

Glenn, A. L., & Raine, A. (2014). Neurocriminology: Implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 54–63.

_____

I imagine you might have a lot to say on the subject. Please share your thoughts on my blog site at https://www.eichingerfineart.com/blog/204283/a-gene-for-cruelty

Reminder. Art is available for sale. Some prices are already reduced for the holidays. Make me an offer if you see something you like that seems beyond your reach. Contact me at marilynne@eichingerfineart.com, and I’ll do my best to have it arrive before Christmas. 

Books by Marilynne Eichinger make a great gift. They are available on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, KOBO, and Powell’s Books.

Leadership Is Not About You

AMERICAN BEAUTY— She may be a convincing speaker and attractive to look at, but that doesnt mean that steel makes a good leader.

Last week, I was invited to speak at an international leadership conference in London. As I considered what to say, I realized how often leadership is presented as a toolkit—team-building frameworks, efficiency metrics, time-management hacks. Useful, yes, but rarely the heart of the matter.

What most conversations skip is the simplest, hardest question: How do you make people actually want to follow you?

Mission helps, but it isnt enough: Managing a nonprofit may seem easier than managing a commercial business because staff usually arrive with a built-in sense of purpose. They want to contribute to the public good. A leader’s job is not to ignite that flame but to keep it burning brightly, ensuring every team member understands the mission well enough to explain it to their family, their friends, and themselves on difficult days.

Founding a nonprofit and growing it by leaps rather than inches is just as challenging as starting a for-profit business. When I started Impression Five Science Museum in Michigan, and later while serving as president of the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry, the obstacles were the same: raising visibility, attracting funding, and navigating a thicket of competition and regulations. Older organizations sometimes feared we would siphon their support when we decided to move and expand. Government rules shifted like sand, forcing us to develop a riverfront walkway that added millions to the cost.

To survive, founders need passion deep enough to outlast rejection and skepticism. They must communicate clearly, not just with wealthy donors but with people from every background, and stay open to feedback that reshapes their ideas.

Leadership sets the tone with immediate results: When I first went to city hall in Michigan seeking support for my fledgling museum, the mayor’s executive assistant dismissed me with a curt instruction to “get in a five-year line.” Her posture, her tone, even the set of her face said, Dont bother.

A year later, with a new administration, the same woman greeted me with a warm smile and asked how she could help. The transformation was stunning. The previous mayor was budget-driven and allergic to new ideas; the new mayor had a can-do mindset and believed in listening to constituents’ ideas to improve the community. His energy had changed the entire staff’s attitude.

That lesson stayed with me: the person at the top creates the emotional climate for everyone else.

The best leaders dont stand above, they stand with: After 25 years of running museums, I left to start a national educational products catalog. That’s where I learned that leadership has little to do with hierarchy and everything to do with the daily emotional reality of the workplace.

A president may sit at the “head” of an organization, but the real movement comes from the arms, legs, and hands. A good leader keeps the whole system healthy.

For me, that meant helping every person—from janitors to call-center staff—understand why their work mattered. We weren’t shipping toys; we were helping children learn and grow. In December, warehouse staff joked that they were “Santa’s helpers,” and they meant it. Call-center employees took pride in matching products to children’s learning styles. Having a purpose made the work feel meaningful.

Everyone has ideas: Suggestions were welcomed from every corner of the building. Receptionists and warehouse workers are often underemployed but full of insight. When someone brought me an idea, I often asked them to explore it further and report back. More than once, a temporary employee became permanent because they showed initiative and creativity. An assistant bookkeeper asked to organize a safety committee did a fantastic job, perhaps better than asking a manager. It gave her a chance to shine.

We also recognized contributions through PRIDE (People Rising In Doing Excellence) awards. Recipients received a stuffed pride animal on their desk for a week. Colleagues would stop by, curious to hear the story behind it. Anyone could nominate someone else—for helping move boxes, sharing lunch, supporting a colleague who was overwhelmed, or pitching in during a tight deadline. We announced the nominations at executive meetings, with applause, ensuring the quiet acts of kindness and effort were recognized.

Leadership at its core, is about worth: Last year, I visited Santa Fe and met with one of the first people I ever hired—an educator from my Michigan museum fifty years ago. She now owns and operates two art galleries, including one in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Over lunch, she told me a story I had long forgotten. Early in her career, she hesitantly came to my office with an idea for a new program. She expected to be dismissed. Instead, she said, I encouraged her to develop it and promised to help her find the funds to make it happen.

“That moment changed my life,” she told me. It gave her the courage to pursue her dreams when she moved to New Mexico.

When people feel their work contributes to society, life becomes more meaningful. When they feel respected, heard, and included, they bring their full selves to the task. Leadership is not about the leader’s ego or vision. It’s about creating an environment where others feel valued and purposeful.

Please share your leadership experiences, both good and bad. Both are enlightening and lead to personal growth. Share at https://www.eichingerfineart.com/blog/204184/leadership-is-not-about-you

Art is always for sale. AMERICAN BEAUTY’s price was reduced for the holiday season. Price includes shipping in continental U.S. Painting is a 40″ by 24 ” acrylic painting. Purchased online at https://www.eichingerfineart.com/workszoom/1650119/american-beauty#/

Don’t know what to give for this holiday. Buy a book. The Water Factor is a  thriller based on fact, offering hours of pleasureable reading. The Water Factor is available through Powells Books, Amazon, Kobo, Barnes and Noble.